AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Review

In this article, I will brief you the complete AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Review by using different attributes and key point. AMD’s new $200 6-core, 12-thread processor, the Ryzen 5 3600, is the replacement for our top best value CPU. The chip has a 65-watt TDP, a 32MB L3 cache, and oscillates between 3.6 and 4.2 GHz. The Wraith Stealth cooler is included, and the MSRP is the same as the R5 2600’s launch price.

The Intel Core i5-9600, which is priced at $213, should be a direct rival to the R5 3600. However, we don’t currently have that component in stock, and it doesn’t seem to be on sale either, so the more costly 9600K will have to do. Although it is not exactly what we were looking for and costs $255, it will be fascinating nevertheless.

We utilized the MSI X570 Creation, set up with DDR4-3200 CL14 memory and the stock cooling, to test the new Ryzen CPU. The identical RAM modules and the 8th and 9th generation Intel Core CPUs were tested on the Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra with the Corsair H115i RGB Platinum AIO liquid cooling.

Also, check out our separate post on Best AM4 CPU

The Intel CPUs are not TDP limited, therefore we are providing the best-case scenario for performance right out of the box; however, when we complete our cost analysis at the conclusion of the study, we will take into account the price of an aftermarket cooler for them. The MSI Trio GeForce RTX 2080 Ti was the graphics card we decided to use.

Pros & Cons

Pros

• In applications, outperforms Intel Core i5-9600K, and nearly equals 8700K and 9700K
• A 10% improvement in gaming performance over the previous generation
• Affordable
• Backs up current AM4 motherboards

Cons

• Gaming still lags below Intel in speed.
• PBO and manual overclocking don’t provide any improvement.
• No built-in graphics

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Price and availability:

If you don’t manage to catch the Ryzen 5 3600 with any CPU offers, it will cost you $199 (£199, AU$315) with the bundled Wraith Stealth cooling. But even so, it is one of the most affordable new mid-range CPUs available. It has the same feature set as the 3600X but is much less expensive.

The Ryzen 5 3600 from AMD succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 from 2018 and offers the mid-range CPU market even more performance and choices. It is just below the Ryzen 5 3600X, which is effectively the same CPU with a little greater clock speed.

The desktop for thrifty gamers is where the Ryzen 5 3600 excels. Although it often performs worse than its speedier brothers, its lesser specifications and cheaper pricing don’t immediately translate into better gaming performance.

In a hurry? Check out my new post on AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Additionally, the additional savings may just as well be used to purchase a better graphics card or more RAM, making the Ryzen 5 3600 an especially alluring choice for gamers who want to maximize their investment.

The Ryzen 5 3600 retains a lower price versus all but the cheapest SKUs of Intel’s Core i5 Coffee Lake Refresh CPUs. Additionally, it enables greater base clock rates with simultaneous multithreading, which Core i5 desktop processors can’t handle (the Core i5-9600k is the exception).

Features and chipset:

While the upgrade from the Ryzen 5 1600 to the Ryzen 5 2600 may have been incremental, AMD’s Zen 2 architecture makes the Ryzen 5 3600 a significant jump. By switching the CPU’s manufacturing process from a 12nm to a 7nm one, AMD is able to increase clock rates, increase IPC and enhance efficiency.

All of these advancements are made while maintaining the same 65W TDP as the Ryzen 5 2600. Increases in the RAM instantly accessible to the CPU cores aid in advancing performance. Similar to the Ryzen 5 3600X, AMD has increased the cache with 384KB of L1, 3MB of L2, and 32MB of L3.

Additionally, the Ryzen 5 3600 switches to the X570 chipset, which supports the newest PCIe 4.0 standard. For PCIe SSDs and AMD’s most recent Navi graphics cards, this provides a significant increase in bandwidth.

But since the Ryzen 5 3600 still supports the AM4 CPU socket, older motherboards are a possibility for computer users who don’t want the added capabilities of the X570 chipset. In other words, replacing a Ryzen 1000-series CPU in a PC will probably be as inexpensive and simple as just inserting the new processor—a motherboard upgrade is not required.

Performance Monitor

The Ryzen 5 3600 performs more modestly overall than previous Ryzen 3000-series processors, yet it still has enough juice to compete in certain areas with even the Intel Core i7-8700K. In terms of single- and multi-core performance, the Ryzen 5 3600 falls slightly short of the 3600X as expected, but its performance in our Handbrake test saw it come very close to matching the X model.

Nevertheless, it continues to do well. It competes head-to-head with the 6-core/12-thread Intel Core i7-8086K, outperforming it in the multi-core Cinebench R15 test and virtually matching it in single-core performance. In the single-core test of GeekBench 4, it performs behind the Core i7-8086K, but outperforms that processor in the multi-core test.

Do check our latest post on the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Efficiency is another appealing aspect of its performance. The Ryzen 5 3600 maintains a much lower level of power consumption under stress than the Intel Core i7-8086K and Core i7-8700K, which reached 110.68W and 100.63W, respectively, because to the switch to the 7nm technology. In contrast, the Ryzen 5 3600 drew just 86.17W from the power source throughout our tests.

Gaming is where the Ryzen 5 3600 truly proves its worth, with some outcomes even outperforming the big guys. On our test system, which has an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, Total War: Warhammer II ran at 1080p with the Ryzen 5 3600 managing a minimum frame rate of 78 and an average frame rate of 101.

These results easily outperform the more expensive, 8-core/12-thread Intel Core i9-9900K. Even its three siblings from higher levels can’t match it. In the same game at 4K, it lags behind its brothers but mostly maintains an advantage over the same three Intel CPUs.

.

Consumption Of Power

The entire system power usage numbers we measured while running the Blender benchmark are maybe even more astounding. As you can see, the quad-core Core i7-7700K and the i5-9600K both used about the same amount of power as the R5 3600.

You may be thinking that using a little bit more power than the 9600K isn’t all that great, but keep in mind that in this test, the 3600 was approximately 40% quicker than the Core i5 CPU. It is thus highly excellent in terms of power efficiency.

This is the main reason why the user wants to know about AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Review as he can predict what power this GPU is consuming.

Thermals

During our one-hour Blender stress test with the Wraith Stealth fitted, the R5 3600 maintained a 4 GHz clock speed out of the box. Given that it was essentially quiet and that this was a severe stress test, having it peak at only 80 degrees is really impressive.

The box cooler can be used to allow PBO, but because you’re already close to the thermal limit, it won’t make much of a difference. In essence, we increased temperature by 4 degrees while gaining 25 MHz, therefore it goes without saying that we do not advise utilizing PBO with the box cooler.

Temperatures dramatically decreased once a good cooler was fitted. Although the Corsair Hydro H115i isn’t necessary, we utilized it since we wanted to do a direct comparison with the 3700X. Anyway, stock temperatures with the AIO liquid cooler added reduced to 62 degrees.

Cooler:

Temperatures dramatically decreased once a good cooler was fitted. Although the Corsair Hydro H115i isn’t necessary, we utilized it since we wanted to do a direct comparison with the 3700X. Anyway, stock temperatures with the AIO liquid cooler added reduced to 62 degrees.

The 3600 now automatically overclocked by 3% to run at 4125 MHz. When PBO was activated, we gained an additional 85 MHz and the load temperature rose to 68 degrees, which is still extremely cool.

Rendering Tests

I have performed several rendering tests for assessment and giving you the exact AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Review. Unless otherwise noted, the results of these tests mostly represent the rendering time and frames per second. We are hoping for a lower time and a greater FPS.

Blender

In addition to rendering the BMW27 scenario in the core Blender programmer, I also utilized the Blender Benchmark app for this. Along with GPU performance, the Blender Benchmark will calculate CUDA, OpenCL, and CPU performance.

A new platform called Blender Benchmark has been created to gather and show the outcomes of software and hardware performance testing. The open-source, free 3D modelling application is called Blender.

Modelling, rigging, animation, simulation, rendering, compositing, motion tracking, even video editing, and game development are all supported.

Corona

Corona is another simple to use rendering benchmark. It starts benching as soon as the software is run. It reports the results in the rendering time and rays per second.

FryBench

A multi-core CPU test called Frybench is built on Fryrender. A physically-based light simulator called fryrender was created by RandomControl, a Spanish business with headquarters in Madrid. All of the components that go into creating the final picture (materials, lighting, and cameras) in the photo-realistic render engine fryrender are based on physically correct models.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark, a free standalone tool, may be used to evaluate how rapidly your hardware renders. The benchmark offers two test scenarios, one for GPUs and the other for CPUs, depending on the kind of processor you wish to evaluate.

POV-Ray

The Durability of Vision For a number of computer systems, Ray Tracer, also known as POV-Ray, is a ray-tracing programmer that creates graphics from a text-based scene description. It was initially based on DKBTrace, a programmer created for the Amiga computers by David Kirk Buck and Aaron A. Collins.

Additionally, Alexander Enzmann, the creator of the previous Polyray rytracer, made contributions. The source code for the free and open-source programmer POV-Ray is made available under the AGPLv3 licence.

Indigo

An impartial, photorealistic GPU and CPU renderer called Indigo Renderer strives for the highest possible visual quality by faithfully modelling the physics of light. Modern rendering performance, materials, and camera models are all made easy by using an interactive, photographic approach and a limited number of abstract parameters.

Cinebench R15

CINEBENCH is a cross-platform, real-world test suite that gauges a computer’s performance potential. CINEBENCH is based on the renowned animation programmer Cinema 4D from MAXON, which is widely used by studios and production facilities all over the globe to create 3D content.

Popular films including Iron Man 3, Oblivion, Life of Pi, and Prometheus, among others, have employed MAXON software. CINEBENCH is the perfect tool to compare CPU and graphics performance across various systems and platforms (Windows and OS X).

On stock clocks, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a lead over the Intel i7 8700k in the CPU score though the Intel i7 8700k has a better single core score thanks to its higher clock speed. But a single-core score is not that low for this price CPU.

Cinebench R20

Cinebench is a cross-platform, real-world test suite that assesses the hardware capabilities of the computer. R20 improves on R15 in order to better represent the latest developments in CPU and rendering technology. This allows for a more precise assessment of Cinema 4D’s capacity to use multiple CPU cores and cutting-edge processor capabilities accessible to the typical use.

Geekbench

Geekbench 4 measures your system’s power and tells you whether your computer is ready to roar. How strong is your mobile device or desktop computer? How will it perform when push comes to crunch? These are the questions that Geekbench can answer. In Geekbench the result is in the form of Single Core and Multi-Core performance.

Conclusion:

As expected, the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers excellent value and, assuming the appropriate BIOS update is applied, will function properly on even the most basic B350 motherboard. For just more than $300, you can get a fantastic combination with our favourite B450 board, the MSI Tomahawk, for brand-new builds. Basically, the cost of a 9600K processor with a midrange cooling.

As we hinted at before in the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Review, R5 3600 seems to be the best choice even for those constructing a fresh PC from the ground up. In every application test we conducted, it outperformed the Core i5-9600K, and in the worst scenario, its performance is comparable to that of a single core.

It will undoubtedly last longer since it has 12 threads instead of only 6, but this time you don’t have to take a chance on Ryzen’s durability because it is already faster right now.

FAQs